Not every business book makes it onto the Klub list, and the rejected pile says as much about the format as the books that get picked. A book gets cut fast if it never gives the reader an actual next move, since plenty of good writing simply does not translate into a Monday morning action. Larry’s test is close to his idea of forcing a monetary response, spend a little, make more, and if a book cannot be reduced to something like that it gets set aside.
Pure theory books tend to lose the room within twenty minutes, since there is nothing in them to test the following week. Books built around chasing attention, virality, or a big audience before any money changes hands get rejected almost automatically, since that runs against the instinct to attack the money first. A few widely praised books got vetoed simply because nobody in the room could point to a single line that changed what they would do differently.
The External API test matters here too: does the book describe plugging into something that already exists, or does it argue for building everything from scratch? Books that argue for building from scratch get a much harder hearing than ones that show how to borrow an existing system.
Length matters less than people expect, a short book with one usable idea beats a long one with none almost every time. Members are blunt about vetoes in the group chat, a book gets one sentence of explanation and then it is off the list.
A couple of rejected books get revisited later anyway, usually after someone tries the idea in real life and comes back with a different opinion. The rejected list is not public, but it shapes what actually makes it to the table just as much as the books that do.
Details: Watch Larry on picking the books
#BooksRejected #BookKlub #Web12